could atheism be wrong?
I'm still an atheist but it seems that the "ephilosophers" out there seem to agree that observation of science itself is of ladenness. Ladenness means that how do we know that we are actually observing something such as the time? What makes us believe that the hands on the clock is accurate? I say results. I've read that agnosticism is in the realm of conscious knowledge while atheism exists within the reality of the objective world. I'm just saying which one has more weight on reality? ~rant: have you ever met a philosphy teacher? they seem like wussies. maybe if they make people doubt everything around them then they can get back at the kids who made fun of them when they were little. :). "oar" we can just say that there has to be something that makes us interact with each other. (you can ignore this part if you want this is just me venting out anger) :t (best blood-sucking vampire emoticon i can produce).

Why are you assuming that atheism is technically science based? One is an atheist because no evidence exists for the existence of God....science need not be part of it. As far as what you speak of, regarding science, you are correct. There have been many writings which suggest such and say that technically science is not objective fully. However, it is still the best objectivity we have.